Recently I was reading about Web
2.0 Business models, an article Web 2.0 Business Models
breaks down the business models used in web
2.0 to two kinds, namely technical as in Skype and Network effect as in MySpace.
I find it quite interesting that there is no mention of the tried and tested
retailing model. This model exists and this Christmas many people will be grateful
for the existence of it. I wouldn’t bracket internet retail ( etailing ) as
either a network effect based business model or a technology based business
model, Amazon customers are loyal because Amazon offers better service at a
lower price than its competitors, there is no tie in owing to network effect
the tie in is pure and simple service. So I would say there is a third category
“good old fashioned business” or E-business where I would mostly place Amazon.com.
Some of the areas of improved
service are things like search inside the book or the Amazon market place where
the same book maybe found in used form and purchased there. So there is a
strong initiative for Amazon to keep on innovating and offering these
innovations as the exposed guts of its technology enabling people to further
innovate on top of that
Check out Amazon improves Web Services
The focus on my analysis was on Web 2.0 products and services - technical apps, communities, and the like.
There is no doubt of a hustling and bustling online retail business but grouping Amazon (the retailer) into this analysis would be like comparing apples to oranges. In Amazon's case, it leverages the Internet to sell products like books, software, CDs, etc. There is a powerful network effect (and first mover advantage) here but you are selling direct to consumers. Not sure what sort of analysis is needed to understand the business model in this case.
In relation to that latter (and larger) point about free AWS, I completley agree. I wrote my piece prior to the Alexa Web Search Platform announcement but I was pleased by it, because I think there is a great opportunity for Amazon to monetize its data, as I mentioned in the quote you highlighted.
Good thoughts.
Posted by: Ken Yarmosh | December 19, 2005 at 10:23 AM